View Full Version : John Ceman vs. Batisteroids
Dark Evangel
05-11-2007, 07:58 AM
who will win? both of them are overrated and can't wrestle.
Dellishell
05-11-2007, 09:05 AM
who will win? both of them are overrated and can't wrestle.John Cen00b. Bastista is a decent wrestler and is strong as sin, Jena Cena is the Military/Eminem reject gone football star.
T_Frick
05-13-2007, 11:21 PM
Cena obviously CAN wrestle. How else do you explain him holding the belt for so long. Do you know how WWE chooses their winners?
Cena would win it hands down. Just 'cause Batista is a fag. He can wrestle, but he has no personality, and he's just some random big guy. You need to be able to act as well as wreslte.
Elijah Snow
05-14-2007, 12:56 AM
^Dear God I hope you're joking
Shadow Replication 1480
05-14-2007, 02:18 AM
Cena actually is a good wrestler, but most of his detractors never take off their blinders long enough to realize it.
Dark Evangel
05-14-2007, 06:12 AM
^Cena's basic moves is only 5 and over all 14. And I hate the way they make him unbeatable. If you want real talent watch TNA or old school WWF which doesn't exist anymore.
Shadow Replication 1480
05-14-2007, 09:21 AM
Movesets mean shit in professional wrestling. Hell, for decades, Ric Flair got by with nothing more than the Figure 4, kneebreaker, backdrop suplex, and regular old vertical suplex. As for him being "unbeatable", what top face has never been unbeatable at some point?
Real talent? TNA? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... There's nobody in that company that's had anywhere the number of good matches Cena's been having for the past year and a half.
T_Frick
05-14-2007, 05:47 PM
TNA?!?!?! Wtf is wrong with you? Sorry if I offend but gimme a frigin break! I'm tired of hearing about TNA. There wrestling is unrealistic and horrible! And all of their wrestlers are WWE's rejects. Their roster is based on people who have been fired by the WWE or just couldn't stay off the drugs. All that TNA is big move after big move. It kind of kills it quickly.
And movesets? Dude, it's not how many moves you got, it's how you do them. Not every wrestler can do 50 different moves. I don't know a single wrestler who use more than 10 moves in a single match. Most of the match is made up of strikes.
Dark Evangel
05-14-2007, 09:10 PM
Have you ever watched TNA? If you don't then stop talking shit to TNA. Even real talented wrestlers like Angle and Sting are on TNA. Btw not only moves that makes you a great wrestler but also on how you carry a match and Cena nor Batista doesn't have either of that.
Shadow Replication 1480
05-15-2007, 01:43 AM
I've watched TNA ever since it started and it's not what I'd call "good" professional wrestling. As for Angle and Sting, Kurt Angle is quite possibly the most overrated pro wrestler I've ever seen. Damn great amatuer wrestling, but he seriously fucking sucks as a pro unless a ring vet is holding his hand through the entire match. Now Sting, on the other hand, has been a legit world class wrestler at one point, but sadly that was over a decade ago before he turned into a complete lazy ass bum.
Btw not only moves that makes you a great wrestler
Wrong. You can do all the moves you want in the ring, but if the crowd doesn't give a shit about YOU or the match you're in, guess what? You're a fucking FAILURE as a pro wrestler. Moves mean shit. Making people care about you enough to react to you matters above all. Get this "movez mean everything" bullshit out of your head and learn how the business works.
but also on how you carry a match and Cena nor Batista doesn't have either of that.
Batista hasn't really shown it, but Cena has in every single big match he's had for the past year. Know what you're talking about before making comments.
T_Frick
05-15-2007, 03:15 PM
I've watched TNA ever since it started and it's not what I'd call "good" professional wrestling. As for Angle and Sting, Kurt Angle is quite possibly the most overrated pro wrestler I've ever seen. Damn great amatuer wrestling, but he seriously fucking sucks as a pro unless a ring vet is holding his hand through the entire match. Now Sting, on the other hand, has been a legit world class wrestler at one point, but sadly that was over a decade ago before he turned into a complete lazy ass bum.
Wrong. You can do all the moves you want in the ring, but if the crowd doesn't give a shit about YOU or the match you're in, guess what? You're a fucking FAILURE as a pro wrestler. Moves mean shit. Making people care about you enough to react to you matters above all. Get this "movez mean everything" bullshit out of your head and learn how the business works.
Batista hasn't really shown it, but Cena has in every single big match he's had for the past year. Know what you're talking about before making comments.
You just seriously got owned dude.
ShadowReplication took the words right out of my mouth.:P
Oh, and btw, like I said before. All of TNA's wrestlers are either old and washed up, or WWE rejects with drugs problems.
That's why Jeff joined TNA for a while. He had a problem with drugs. Obviously he cleaned himself up 'cause he's back in REAL wrestling again.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.