Snow Princess
09-16-2006, 04:41 PM
Would it be possible for members to be bound to a limited amount of threads they can start in a limited amount of time?!
I mean I see some members here whom have the IQ of a …erm moving on… and they keep popping out with these unbearable threads to read, which they don't put much thought into O_o I mean all kind of threads that starts with one or two lines they managed to squeeze out of their brain cells or worst duplicated threads, and by doing so insightful well written threads tend to be pushed down therefore no one sees them or reply on them. Is this fair?? Shouldn't everyone here be limited to a reasonable threads number they can start once every three or four days so that we can read the good and the bad all together, at least this way the good ones will keep lasting. And if you're going to say that a good thread will last and get more viewers either way, then allow me to tell you that we all have this thirst to reply in these stupid threads to make a mockery out of the starter hence the stupid thread keeps hanging around for eternity ><
And yeah I read "Thread Creation" thread here posted by DeepThought where he asks for a thread starter to require a postcount over 20 posts to be able to make threads. Well even if any member here have a post count of 1, 20 or even a 1000, he/she can still make insightful or stupid threads. So it doesn’t matter what post count they have, what matters is the limited threads amount they can make each time, so that everytime they think of making one they'll try and put a little bit of well measured thoughts init.
I mean I see some members here whom have the IQ of a …erm moving on… and they keep popping out with these unbearable threads to read, which they don't put much thought into O_o I mean all kind of threads that starts with one or two lines they managed to squeeze out of their brain cells or worst duplicated threads, and by doing so insightful well written threads tend to be pushed down therefore no one sees them or reply on them. Is this fair?? Shouldn't everyone here be limited to a reasonable threads number they can start once every three or four days so that we can read the good and the bad all together, at least this way the good ones will keep lasting. And if you're going to say that a good thread will last and get more viewers either way, then allow me to tell you that we all have this thirst to reply in these stupid threads to make a mockery out of the starter hence the stupid thread keeps hanging around for eternity ><
And yeah I read "Thread Creation" thread here posted by DeepThought where he asks for a thread starter to require a postcount over 20 posts to be able to make threads. Well even if any member here have a post count of 1, 20 or even a 1000, he/she can still make insightful or stupid threads. So it doesn’t matter what post count they have, what matters is the limited threads amount they can make each time, so that everytime they think of making one they'll try and put a little bit of well measured thoughts init.